Tags
Ferguson has become a Rohrshock test. We all see what we want to see… or even more scary, what our life experience has conditioned us to see. But can we view it as a teaching moment for each of us? Can we find a lesson that applies with equal force to both sides of this divide? I think we can… and I’d like to suggest a passage in the Bible written by a black man 2800 years ago … which I think will become more and more relevant as events like Ferguson draw us into a web of conflict.
Zephaniah 2:3 –
3Seek the LORD,
All you humble of the earth
Who have carried out His ordinances;
Seek righteousness, seek humility.
Perhaps you will be hidden
In the day of the LORD’S anger.
Zephaniah was written during the reign of King Josiah, roughly 700 BC. Though it had relevance then, the scope of Zephaniah’s language is worldwide … it is an end times prophecy.
One of Zephaniah’s themes is the “day of Jahweh’s anger.” In my view this is a codeword, not for fire and brimstone and planetary destruction — but for a measured economic and geopolitical upheaval — an era of teaching by God — when people will have their attention drawn to major issues of justice and morality.
Another of Zephaniah’s themes is the “gathering of nations”. In chapter 3 it is called “assembling the kingdoms”. In order to make sense of the “Lord’s anger”, they are brought into a collective conversation, an international consciousness as never before. Today we call it globalization. I believe Zechariah was talking about the 21st century. Issues anywhere are the concern of people everywhere.
Another theme is the universality of God’s proposed rule of earth. As Zephaniah describes it, “All the earth” is encompassed in his vision. All the earth gets its teaching moments, and all the earth will in due time get the blessings of God’s grace.
In my attempts to understand the Bible I find it useful to recognize that “the earth” in prophecy is often a metaphorical description of the stable, powerful portions of society worldwide. Zephaniah’s phrase “All the earth will be devoured” means that society — social and governmental institutions — will melt and lose cohesion as a result of the intense heat and pressure of social and geopolitical change. Peter used similar language when he spoke in 2 Peter 3 of melting elements. He wasn’t talking about chemistry. That word, everywhere else in the New Testament, is used for the first principles, the kindergarten issues that children learn in primary school.
Another prophetic theme is special blessings promised for Israel, an acknowledgement of the sins of Israel but a promise of divine correction and healing. In Zechariah’s vision there will be a worldwide hatred and affliction of the Jews that will prevail for a time, before ending in worldwide acceptance of the Jewish people. Zephaniah states that the Jewish people will become “a praise in every land where they have been put to shame”. (3:8, 17, 20) So far, we are seeing increasing fulfillments of the shame, but not of the acceptance that will follow it.
If the “fierce anger” of the Lord is being played out right now on the world stage, what is God angry at?
- Needlessly perpetuating poverty. If Isaiah 58 and Ezekiel 16:49 provides any hints, one big area to pay attention to would be the way the poor are treated. While poverty has always been a human problem, the immense increase of wealth of the last century has created opportunities — and responsibilities — for alleviating it. Ezekiel called it “not strengthening the hand of the poor and needy.” While I cannot disagree that many forms of welfare fail to strengthen the hand of the poor and needy, there is no doubt that we know enough to create programs that would do a better job of doing just that. We understand the value of education, the need of food and shelter, the value of freedom from worry about basic necessities. Is it not the duty of society to work protect its citizens? To give due process for the poor as well as the rich? Today wealthy individuals, churches, and nations of the world could make a much bigger impact — if they have the will to do what they can.
- Environmental degradation. If Revelation 11:18 is relevant — and I believe it is — God is angry at those who are destroying the earth. We are all complicit in the destruction of the earth in an ecological sense. But the powerful extractive, exploitive forces have in many cases grabbed the levers of power and use “democracy” to bring “progress” and “development” — code words for destroying the earth — forward in ways that only benefit their multinational appetites and shareholders. This behavior is creating consequences that will hurt all of us.
- Religions that present God as cruel and unjust. I think that God is not pleased with the reputation he is getting from mainstream Christian teachings. More on that in other posts.
I would submit that God’s anger does not reveal itself through torment or after-death horror … but through consequences of our actions coming to pass.
For example, we dump subsidized corn and wheat on countries that have farmers who would like to support themselves growing local food. They can’t compete with our agribusiness products … and if there is a just God, he is taking note. We sell poisons and high-tech seeds to third world countries, destroying their organic economies and making them dependent on our seed stocks and chemicals. We extract oil, minerals, and cheap commodity crops like coffee or beef from countries who can satisfy our appetite for these things … but don’t use our influence to make the companies who employ those workers pay a living wage and humane benefits.
We destroy wetlands, pump poison into aquifers, degrade the atmosphere, waste soil, destroy the natural cycle of life, turn mountains upside down to get coal or rare metals, and let the powerless people who thus lose whole counties to privileged greed live in the poison wasteland that remains. We dump pollution into the oceans — plastics and chemicals which are working their way up the food chain and putting toxins into our children’s brains. We overfish, overharvest, overuse, and overlook the importance of our role in all of that.
I believe that if there is a God, and if he is at all good, he has a burning anger about these abuses. And I see evidence that just such a God exists, and is pushing on the boundaries of our activities, and will soon box us into a very narrow range of options. Our denial of climate science, or our refusal to be moved by the desperation suicides of tens of thousands of Indian farmers due to the impact of chemical farming methods, will not prevent us from reaping the impact of our choices. Before long, we will have no way out, and society itself — all our institutions — will melt under the pressure of our own mistakes.
Which brings me to Zephaniah’s words of advice to all of the people who are alive during this world-wide chain of calamities. “Seek meekness, seek righteousness.”
We fought the bloodiest war in our history over the issue of slavery. But did we all learn the lesson? Slavery by Another Name by Douglas Blackmon documents how we put economic shackles aided by community policing … vagrancy laws … into place almost immediately to prevent true economic equality from gaining a foothold. Blacks continue to feel the results of our forefathers’ practice of treating black men like animals valued for their brute strength and breeding capacity, black children as economic assets to be torn from their mothers as soon as they were weaned, and black women as baby factories and nursemaids. The systemic destruction of every trace of family memory, language, culture and geography by self-righteous “Christian” Europeans continues to haunt both transplanted Africans and indigenous Americans. Like the salt that the Romans sowed in Carthage, two centuries of enforced ignorance created a barren cultural soil that struggles to find an identity of learning and curiosity that more privileged classes take for granted. The flourishing of black colleges and the renaissance of black erudition that has occurred in the last century and a half are not because of, but in spite of all the economic and cultural impacts our dominant culture has inflicted upon the black race … I so I view the progress of blacks in our society is a miracle. But could the healing and growth be greater? I believe so, and I believe the bruised reeds need to be helped.
When Zephaniah wrote his prophecy, he called us to meekness and righteousness. What, specifically did he mean by “righteousness”? It is a Hebrew word, tzedakah, which means fairness or justice. In the Hebrew traditions of Zephaniah’s day, slavery was a significant part of the economy of the time. The law on their books called for a complete forgiving of debts every 7 years, and a complete redistribution of land among the historical Jewish settler families every 49 years. Justice to Zephaniah meant egalitarianism — the notion that shared citizenship meant blood ties that transcended economics, and broke cycles of dependence through mandatory sharing and forgiveness of debts.
I think these ideas have special meaning today, at a time when extremes in wealth distribution have never been greater — especially in the USA. If we seek justice or fairness, we will not consider it acceptable for extreme poverty to coexist with extreme wealth. And so a true love of tzadakah will lead us to a kind of humility that is anathema to the privileged classes — especially the Christian Right — of today.
To catch Zephaniah’s spirit we will accept as part of our humbling the voluntary sharing in and shouldering of the burdens of the unfortunate masses who surround us. I’m not talking about perfunctory handouts but empowerment, training, and a commitment to building the standard of living of all peoples. Meekness will teach us to consider the poor as part of us, part of our family, part of our responsibility. Instead of responding to the poverty of surrounding nations and neighborhoods with a doubling down of the security apparatus, we will look for creative ways to alleviate the hunger and soul-thirst of our fellow human beings.
A friend sent me the following link. He is a Christian whom I greatly respect, but I don’t see the following clip as particularly helpful to understanding what is going on in Ferguson:
Words of Jonathon Gentry
I think that Mr. Gentry’s words, well intentioned as they may be, have the effect of patronizing conservative folks, while ignoring the fact that there was no corresponding “swallowing of pride” going on among the police and justice system in Ferguson. Jonathon’s words, and the words of the Fox commentators I have seen, are not meek words. They are angry and incendiary. Jonathon’s “righteous indignation” adds the heat of anger and the flame of finger-pointing to the conflict that is brewing in America’s cities.
I’ve seen plenty of white rants on the social media … focusing on the criminality of an 18-year-old man, his hubris, his disrespect of the white policeman who stopped him that day. Even if all the details of the officer’s version of events were true, what is the subtext? What made Michael Brown so angry and unable to chart a more pragmatic course? What made Darren Wilson so fearful, so belligerent and so authoritative in his tone? My experience with human nature tells me that both men poured gasoline, and both men tossed in matches. But both of these men are products of a culture. They are no more free to choose their actions than any of us are free to will ourselves into consistency with the standards we ourselves recognize, or another year of life.
But what Zephaniah calls us to do is pursue meekness, fairness, equality.
Does anyone think very many blacks were won over by Jonathan’s rant? I surely don’t. And I can understand why. It’s because blacks are tired of feeling like intruders in their own neighborhoods. Granted, no blacks or whites should be shoplifting, selling drugs, engaging in gang violence, etc. But we need to understand the process that has fostered these sick social conditions.
Does anyone think that the whites who have welcomed Jonathon’s words are becoming more flexible, humble, and tolerant as a result? I personally doubt it. I think Jonathan simply became a useful cover for those who want to point the finger of blame at the black race, want to be satisfied that slavery is ancient history. We would do well to remember Lincoln’s words, and recognize that there may yet be wheels of retribution that are still turning toward a price that the great grand-children of slaveowners might have to pay:
From Lincoln’s 2nd Inaugural Address:
One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. “Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.” If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
Zephaniah was a black man.
It’s interesting that Zephaniah was probably a black man… his father was “Cushi” — an Ethiopian. His message has a particular power when it is seen as an exhortation to meekness — and fairness for the poor.
Like it or not, the prophet doesn’t only ask the poor to be more meek. Nor does he ask only the more powerful factions to be more meek. Everyone is addressed… especially those who see themselves as the Lord’s people. Zephaniah no doubt had the Jews in mind, but I would apply it with equal or greater force to Christians today.
I believe that seeking meekness will mean that we will avoid violence of any kind in the face of perplexing challenges to our safety and property rights. While law and order is a necessity as long as fallen man is administering his own affairs, there are ways of softening the impact of the necessary firmness of the law.
On an individual level, the kind of softness I refer to will mean we will listen to angry outbursts from any sector without reacting aggressively. It will mean we will recognize, as Martin Luther King put it, that even riots have a message — “the outcry of the unheard.” It will look behind extremes of action and foolish behavior, and look for a way to understand the root causes behind it … and for ways we can help show a courageous level of forgiveness and generosity toward those who have been victimized in ways we have never personally felt. If we can meet even unjust anger and hostility with meekness, it may be that we will be hid in the days of the Lord’s just anger.
But even if we are not, and we become unjust victims, we should not worry about the ultimate outcome. A feast of fat things is around the corner. A new language will teach all people to serve God with one consent.
There is line in one of the Jane Austin movies wherein 2 people are talking, and one says “I see we will not readily agree with one another.” I think that is the case with us, though I delight to know we agree on the final and everlasting conclusion. Of course, I am glad that the Kingdom is coming whether you and I agree or not!
I believe that true conservatism (as opposed to “liberal” or perhaps “Left” ideology) is the “best way to go” for humanity. It’s the best way for everyone, including (if not especially) for minorities, the disenfranchised, women, and, yes, even the environment. In fact, it’s by far better – especially in the long run. My view, overly stated, is that liberals will help build someone a house, and conservatives will help that person get trained and employed so that they can buy a house. The former looks wonderful and compassionate, and it truly is. It’s just that the latter ends up being better for more of the population, and for a longer time, and there are several other allied benefits.
Fox News is definitely biased, but – in my opinion – not nearly so much as MSNBC. I think it’s good to realize all news sources have a bias. As a conservative, I am amazed that like-minded people don’t see the Fox bias. I am even more amazed that liberals actually do not believe that MSNBC is biased. I can handle Fox News for an hour or so at most; I cannot handle MSNBC for more than 20 minutes. I am working on that!
I once heard of a great idea for close friends of very different political views – each one passes along an article or a video or whatever for their friend to listen to, read, etc. This is done perhaps once a month. That way, each person can be exposed to well-spoken advocates of a different opinion. In my experience, when I suggest this to liberal friends, most won’t participate, but some begrudgingly do. The idea actually works out very nicely.
On the issue of remembering slavery and having compassion for the Black community, I think that many of the seemingly-compassionate efforts are not only not good, but actually damaging. It is just so much misguided highly-selective compassion. It prolongs a sort of dysfunction. In my work, I meet and speak with a lot of people. I can’t tell you how many Black men and women I have met that simply cannot stand the sort of no-end-in-sight movement to continually remind Blacks of the slavery history that, in their collective opinion, keeps their ethnic group in the victim mentality. They don’t want to forget the history, but they have moved on to a positive life of success. It is so very refreshing to see.
May I be a bit sarcastic for a moment? Right now, the British royals William and Kate are touring some sites in America. If I had the opportunity to meet them, I would not bring up how the English persecuted individuals that eventually left and went to what is now the United States. It’s not William’s fault, nor his parents, nor his grandparents. And, I did not suffer from the persecution – nor did my parents or grandparents. Time to get on with life, to move forward, not constantly revisit past mistakes as if they happened yesterday. Every group, every ethnicity, has made huge mistakes – messing up is an equal opportunity employer.
Anyway, there are so many of these issues, and our reasons for taking one side or another are likely multi-layered, with none of us having it all down right. I love discussing these issues to better understand how we each draw conclusions. I am just severely restrained by time, or, more directly, how I have arranged my life. I am working on that too.
Bob
LikeLike
Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Bob.
I completely agree that if a person of conservative persuasion is dedicated to helping an unfortunate person, and chooses to do so by training and empowering them, it will do them more good than so-called liberal handouts that perpetuate a victim mentality.
I think this is what the Apostle Paul meant when he said that it’s more important to give seed than grain.
However, Paul also presented a very liberal notion of egalitarianism when he advocated that those with extra should share with those who had less.
In my experience the practical patterns of self-styled conservatives are to act as though financial differences are God-given rewards of noble action, rather than benefits that accrue from privilege. While I agree with you that there is an awful lot of self-pity and blaming others for situations that are 80% or more the result of personal decisions and lifestyle choices, it seems to me that the religious conservative mindset has a significant blind spot, as well.
To me that blind spot is that the kingdom of God is substantially in power and ruling the world … and that therefore the disparities in privilege are either irrelevant, and not a big deal to either the fortunate or unfortunate … or that the disparities are part of a system of divine grace which has unalterably chosen to favor some individuals while not favoring others.
Where might such a blind spot come from? If you look at the doctrinal roots of the two major sectors of protestant Christianity, you have Calvinists on one side and Arminians on the other. Yet both viewpoints leave the unsaved and unregenerate in their condition without much worry or empathy on the part of Christians.
Calvinists believe in the notion of Limited Atonement. In other words, God limited the extent to which the blood of Christ will reach the population of earth. To Calvinists, All does not mean All when it says, “Even so in Christ will all be made alive.” The poor and unbelievers are not simply waiting for their turn at salvation. They are substantively different because the salvation opportunity was in God’s “grace” not extended to them. And we the saved are taught to be happy about that. Any conscience pangs we might have about the L in TULIP is supposed to be made bearable by the I — Irresistable grace. In other words, those whom God has ordained to receive grace will receive it, not because of their virtue, but because it is irresistible. And because it is irresistible, the practical result is that those who don’t accept salvation and God’s grace were not ordained to. No true Calvinist would say this is the unsaved person’s fault… but in practical fact in my view, that’s how Calvinist doctrine teaches its adherents to act.
The Arminians, on the other hand, believe that it’s up to each individual to respond to God’s message. And to prove to themselves that each individual CAN, Wesley taught the idea of “prevenient grace” — preceding grace which was God’s previous softening of the hearts of people before the clear preaching of the gospel reaches them. The result is that in Methodist thinking, if someone “receives the grace of God in vain”, it shows they are unworthy of it… since they resisted it.
Thus in both world views the practical conclusion is that the unresponsive, unbelieving souls are in that condition because of either God’s choice or their own choice… and either way there’s nothing we can or should do about it other than try to preach as earnestly as we can.
I would argue that these theological perspectives morphed into economic and political perspectives as capitalism came to have unlimited sway in Western culture.
If you look at the history of economic thought from the 18th century till now, the Calvinist and Arminian notions that I have described led to a Malthusian view of life. Bad stuff happens and that’s the way it is. Unequal distribution is no one’s fault, and it is disrespectful of God and Order to try to “play the class warfare card.”
While it is true that some folks break out of the mold, and some get stronger because of the adversity they face (while others grow weaker because of the privilege that protects them) as a general rule the rich throughout our culture get richer and the poor get poorer. Christians are usually ok with that, because, didn’t Jesus say that spiritually speaking, those who had something would gain more, while those who had less would lose even what they had? That sounds a lot like the economic world we live in.
In this Christianized worldview, the mainly white, mainly European-heritage upper classes got that way by honest work and the providence of God … not because of the riches and privileges they enjoy under our system and laws.
But in my reading on this subject I am persuaded that the more you look at the laws and regulations of farming, banking, insurance, student loans, etc., the more this pattern of favoritism of the elites becomes apparent.
I agree with the paradoxical notion that struggle is good for people, and handouts that become entitlements can weaken them. But unlike the mainstream Christian notions of status quo being part of the created order from God, I believe God intends to turn the current status quo on its head, and elevate the poor at the expense of the rich. Elevate the blacks and browns at the expense of the whites. I could be wrong, but that’s where I think history is heading. And I think that process will accomplish much of the moral realignment of the world that God intends to do.
God’s full grace of restitution for all, blessings for all, equal and loving sharing of the earth for all, is the great elevating force God will use with all the poor, and like Jean Valjean it will turn their lives around, and melt the hardness that currently makes the poor insensitive and unworthy of that coming grace.
LikeLike
Greetings Owen!
A quick question so I can get a feel for where you are on the concepts of free trade and capitalism:
Let’s say some guy (like a Steve Jobs type) invents a product, brings it to market, and millions of people buy it. It improves their lives, and the expanding production facilities provide employment for thousands of people. Let’s then say the inventor and producer of the product makes millions, and eventually, billions of dollars. So, he is now super wealthy. Do you think that is all OK? Do you think there should be a limit to his wealth, and, if so, how should it be limited or restrained?
Thanks!
LikeLike
I think that wealth produced by labor and capital should not be taxed at all. I have several books by economists who calculate the dead weight burdens of income tax as about equal to the gross national product. In other words we would be twice as wealthy as a country if we did not tax labor (wages) and capital gains (the proceeds of concentrated labor, which is what machinery amounts to).
On the other hand, the oil, minerals, water, and land of the world belong to the commonwealth, and anyone using land or natural resources should be taxed heavily for that usage of resources. This would minimize the consumption of resources and naturally but a break on the unsustainable trends we see around us.
I also think that interest income … the money that flows in just because we have invested assets, should be taxed … In economic terms, labor and capital should not be taxed, but interest and economic rent (the income that flows from land and natural resources “ownership”) should be taxed.
Land value should be taxed, but not improvements on that land. This has been effective in Australia, Hong Kong, and New Hampshire.
See The Taxation of Land Value by John Orr, Tax Shift by … I forget… and The Losses of Nations and The Power of the Land by Fred Harrison. And the classic book on this is Progress and Poverty by Henry George.
We should also double down on the taxation of anything that pollutes. A significant carbon tax is all we need to slow down global warming, for example. Much greater gasoline taxes would reduce our need of roads and all the negative effects of traffic, etc. Taxing poisons extremely heavily, as well as major regulation of anything poisonous that folks want to put into the environment, would also be much better than our current policy of subsidizing chemical farming methods to the tune of billions of dollars … which puts organic farmers in poor countries at a disadvantage against the dumping of cheap American corn and wheat, etc.
I like the Jubilee model in the Bible, too. Debts should be forgiven every 7 years. Imagine the benefit of forgiving student loans after a period of time. We have 1.2 Trillion in student loans in this country. The Australian method is for the state to provide education for free, wait 10 years, then collect 10% of the student’s income for the next 10 years… something like that. The division of land among people, as you know, was repeated every 49 years. This prevented what we have now in most western countries, a landed aristocracy and a permanent under class.
Should your Steve Jobs guy feel obligated to share his wealth? Morally speaking, voluntarily, I would say yes. We are our brothers’ keeper… and Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have committed to give back 90% of their income. A very accessible movie on this is Robert Reich’s recent film, “Inequality for All”. Also “Inside Job”, the documentary about the Wall Street collapse of 2007.
LikeLike
Thanks again for the reply. I have great objection to the concept of debts being forgiven every 7 years, or actually at all. Part of my opinion is a different take on the Jubilee system, and part of it might have to do with my wife and I being business owners, and being on the receiving end of customers who won’t pay, and eventually legally don’t have to. They go merrily on their way while we are left with a loss. Good for them; not so good for us!
Taxing that which pollutes is, in my opinion, a good idea. Of course, we will need to include the incredulous wind farm industry – a significant killer of rare birds of prey like bald and golden eagles. The White House has given wind farm owners a pass on killing eagles (anyone can Google that). So, a felony crime has been sidestepped in the name of so-called “sustainable energy.” (Oh, don’t get me started on that!) A good article on the topic can be found at http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2013/09/22/wind-energy-gets-away-with-murder/. Since this issue is not covered well (at all?) in popular media outlets, not too many folks are aware of it.
One more thought for now – it’s interesting how our general mindset on energy can alter how we look at a situation. I have read about an interesting concept of viewing fossil fuels as something wonderful – abundantly provided in many parts of the world, including and perhaps especially in the United States. We, collectively, haven’t used this source of energy terribly well, and that definitely needs improving. But what if oil is a truly amazing energy source? We just need to to much better on getting it and using it.
If we, however, start with the concept that “oil is bad and solar is good” etc., our processing of ideas on energy is tainted, or at least influenced. Maybe the best energy solution for all of us is right under our feet – we just perceive it as not a good thing. Maybe our perception is right, but maybe it’s wrong.
Well, my musings are over for now – maybe more later!
LikeLike
I agree that simple forgiveness of debts would create a ton of abuse. Perhaps if it were coupled with first being sold in slavery to the one to whom the debt is owed… 🙂
But don’t you think that we could agree that all the people of the world own the earth’s resources … not the people who through luck or previous wealth get the opportunity to monopolize it for their personal profit?
LikeLike
The Arsenal boss will also have to decide on Wojciech Szczesnys future if he returns from his loan at Roma, who may decide to buy.
LikeLike
It is thought he will start at centre-back, his preferred role – though he can also play at right-back.
LikeLike