• About
  • Bio

Happy God

~ The Bible calls God happy. I wonder why?

Happy God

Monthly Archives: February 2005

God can defend himself

28 Monday Feb 2005

Posted by Owen in eschatology, love of God, Theodicy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

eschatology, love of God, prophecy, Theodicy

Friday I talked about how God needs a PR firm. But the truth is as the poet said, “God is his own interpreter. He will make it plain.”

I poked some fun at people who like to justify God’s actions or inaction in the world. The spectacle of a faith-healer calling God to action at his behest, to lengthen a leg or clear up a lung, while that same God chooses not to grant the petitions of millions of earnest folks causes me to cringe. When I think of the history of Christianity, and its involvement in slavery, exploitation, and carnage, I am saddened when I hear Christians complaining about how us poor Christians are being beat up by the “liberals”. Is it not true that “Christians” have hurt millions of people? Yet many of my brethren want Christians to have more political power, I think the unvarnished truth is that the more power “Christians” have had in history, the more they have mismanaged it.

Yes, Christianity has a good view of marriage and morality. I agree with that. I disagree with the notion that man is the only God, and I certainly do not agree with New Age notions that there are many pathways that lead to God. Christianity is shockingly clear that there is only one way to God. But what most Christians seem to be missing just now is that God has more than one way, and more than one time, to get his message to all the people who have ever lived. Jesus died for universal redemption, and that redemption will be available for those who do not respond to the “call” or “drawing” of God in this age.

Contrary to what most Christians think, God has not done all that he plans to do to interact with the world. At the moment, he has, according to a number of clear statements in the Bible, wrapped up his plans and purposes in a mystery. Most people simply don’t understand what he is doing. As Romans 1 puts it, the wrath of God has been revealed — everyone can see it. They can see God is opposed to evil. They can see that people suffer and die. That is God’s wrath, and every time you go to a funeral you see it again. But in the same context, the writer says, “The righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith.” In other words, only people of faith can see that God is good and righteous. Most people simply can’t see it.

Romans goes on to say that those who are granted faith in God’s love and goodness become the sons of God. Not that all who have faith understand everything. But they have enough trust to get through the rough points in life and keep believing in God and keep learning lessons from him.

Later, in Romans 9, the apostle writes that the whole creation groans together, waiting for the revealing of the sons of God. And it says that all of the world of mankind was made subject to this vanity or frailty against their will, by God, for his own reasons.

The big thing that all people can look forward to in confidence is that someday soon God will indeed reveal his full plans, and take charge of the earth. And here is the surprise for most Christians. That day will be unpleasant for the world of mankind, much the same way that Midterm Exams are unpleasant — since all people have significant badness in their lives, but it will not be the end of human life, but rather the beginning of God’s plans to teach everyone else. “When God’s judgments are in the earth” — everyone dies? — no, “the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.” – Isaiah 26:9

Now is the time for the learning and testing of God’s children, authentic Christians of any and all denominations. When that work is done, God will stop playing his cards so close to his chest, and will start explaining things.

Still, if anyone wants to know what God is planning, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist or get a degree from the Dallas Theological Seminary. In fact, they may not let you graduate from the DTS if you read and believe what the Bible says God’s goals are. They are clear and plain, but they are directly opposite most main-stream teachings:

The earth? He created it to be inhabited.
Heaven? It will be united and harmonized with earth.
People? They will be more valuable than gold. All of them shall return from the dead. All the graves will be opened. Even the fools will find it possible to be transformed — stumbling stones will be gathered up, hindrances to obedience will be removed, and the pathway to true righteousness will be so wide and smooth that everyone will be able to go up it. The blind eyes will be opened, the old man will return to the days of his youth. The church of Christ will be the rulers and judges and teachers of the whole world. Spontaneous music and joy will erupt from people everywhere. There will be NO ignorance of God. The earth will become a paradise. Evildoers will be eliminated, first by transforming most of them into righteous people, second, after a millennium of attempting to teach and correct the incorrigible, by eliminating them after a final test. There will be no pain, tears, or conflict when the process is complete.

And all people will glorify God because of their own private experience with how he rescued them and made all their pain contribute to their education and moral development.

More on God’s Goals at http://www.whyjesusdied.com/q08_ggoals.html

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Daniel H. Pink

27 Sunday Feb 2005

Posted by Owen in books

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Dan Pink

Here’s a guy I admire. Excellent writer, good researcher, good analytical thinker. His book Free Agent Nation was excellent, and now he’s about to come out with A Whole New Mind, about the need for people in the West to expand the effectiveness of their right brain activities in order to continue competing with the left-brain folks in the world who are willing to work for less. Check out the sneak preview in Wired: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.02/brain.html

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Defending God

26 Saturday Feb 2005

Posted by Owen in books, Theodicy

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Theodicy

http://everystudent.com/features/whypick.html

Positive, upbeat attempt to defend God and get folks to warm up to the God of the Bible. When I think about my own foolishness, and yet my eagerness to defend God, it’s no wonder the Bible speaks of him as being wounded in the house of his friends. Isaiah 42:14 describes how God feels, holding his peace while ignorant enemies curse and mock, and even worse, ignorant “friends” make outlandish and confusing claims.

But the funniest thing about our world is that foolish folks like me comprise God’s PR firm. And boy, does God need a PR firm. A tsunami strikes and leaves 200,000 dead and millions in despair. And God gets blamed. A tornado strays from the cornfields into a town, and the “In Good Hands” people write down, “Act of God”. My, how God’s “actions” speak louder than the words of His defenders. On that score, the best we have are things like the everystudent.com website, which tries valiantly but in vain to apologize for Him. A few are comforted, and even fewer find real faith; but most folks continue to wonder why God, if He’s good, doesn’t do something to offset the incredible evil in the world. Or if He’s God, and wishes He could, why isn’t He God — powerful enough to take on the evil, and WIN?

Here’s my take. Hold traditionalist Christians’ feet to the fire. Make them explain their beliefs. Sooner or later, they will start to see that the Bible is more hopeful and positive about God’s plans than they have acknowledged thus far. Don’t give up. The traditionalists have some things right, and the Bible is a good thing, the only thing worth searching for answers. But some of the answers are not emerging, it seems to me, from a traditionalist paradigm.

I would encourage such to explain why children die. Die of AIDS, starvation, abortion, disease. Die, often, at the hands of their parents. Is it because God wants them in heaven? Is it because they did something bad?
Perhaps if they honor the Bible they’ll say, “the children didn’t do anything bad, but they were ‘born sinners.'” OK — so children are born with a sin nature — they were condemned by their heredity, to be born imperfect and dying, in an imperfect and dying world. Fine. So where do they go when they die? “Oh, not sure, but they sure couldn’t go to hell — they don’t deserve that. God is merciful. He’ll deal with it.” (Encourage further discussion by asking…) When the kids grow up. And like kids, they become thiefs, beggars, or fools. And then they die, without accepting Christ. What becomes of them? The traditionalist is stuck. He hears himself say, (if Arminian) “they were free to choose, and they rejected Christ.” But were they born sinners? “Oh yes, they disobeyed God back in the garden of Eden. We all blew it.” Yes, I’ve heard many a preacher say, “we all deserve hell, because we rebelled against God.” (The Calvinists would never make that mistake. They can see that the adults, like the children were slaves of sin, and unable to make a decision to break free. So they say that God ordained some to hell, and some to heaven. No real choice in the matter at all, but strictly up to God’s grace. Whereupon the Arminians, Wesleyans, etc. say, “What Rot! God ordains people to eternal hell?!! No way! God wishes they would turn away from it, but they CHOOSE to rebel! It’s their own fault!”

(Check out John Wesley’s words against Calvinism: (Sermon 55, p1: – http://www.godrules.net/library/wsermons/wsermons55.htm) “Whatever the generality of people may think, it is certain that opinion is not religion: No, not right opinion; assent to one, or to ten thousand truths. There is a wide difference between them: Even right opinion is as distant from religion as the east is from the west. Persons may be quite right in their opinions, and yet have no religion at all; and, on the other hand, persons may be truly religious, who hold many wrong opinions. Can any one possibly doubt of this, while there are Romanists in the world? For who can deny, not only that many of them formerly have been truly religious, as Thomas a Kempis, Gregory Lopez, and the Marquis de Renty; but that many of them, even at this day, are real inward Christians? And yet what a heap of erroneous opinions do they hold, delivered by tradition from their fathers! Nay, who can doubt of it while there are Calvinists in the world, — assertors of absolute predestination? For who will dare to affirm that none of these are truly religious men? Not only many of them in the last century were burning and shining lights, but many of them are now real Christians, loving God and all mankind. And yet what are all the absurd opinions of all the Romanists in the world, compared to that one, that the God of love, the wise, just, merciful Father of the spirits of all flesh, has, from all eternity, fixed an absolute, unchangeable, irresistible, decree, that part of all mankind shall be saved, do what they will; and the rest damned, do what they can!”

* * *

But wait, I thought you said the poor innocent children don’t deserve hell, that wouldn’t be fair. When did they start to deserve it? Was there a moment in their life when they began to actually do stuff that made them worthy of eternal torment?
If they die “in their sins” is it the sins they committed in this life that put them over the edge, or is it the sins they committed when they were in their forefathers, way back in the Garden? Let’s be explicit, and let’s be precise. Well, the traditionalist may finally say, I don’t know precisely, but I know one thing. There is none righteous, no not one. And the gift of God is eternal life.”

Of course, in more manly times, the traditionalists were at least consistent. They woudn’t let babies into church until they were baptized, because babies were going to hell — they were born in sin. So medieval churches had baptism fonts outside the church where the babies could get sprinkled and saved.

What’s the solution?

Believe the Bible. Hell and death will be thrown in the lake of fire, too. Rev. 20:14 What could that possibly mean? Well, if “thrown into the lake of fire” means tormented forever in conscious suffering, it doesn’t make much sense to me. But if “thrown into the lake of fire” means annihilated, destroyed, then that makes sense. Hell and death will be annihilated. How does one annihilate death? By doing what Acts 24:15 and John 5:25-29 and 1 Cor. 15:22 say will happen. All the dead will come to life again. You destroy death by universally, in every instance, replacing it with life again. So other scriptures agree “Death will be swallowed up in victory.” Isaiah 25:8 All the dead will be brought back to life. All the tears will be wiped away. Revelaton 21:1-4 All the sickness will be over. How does one destroy “hell”? The same way, because “hell” = hades, and hades means oblivion, the condition of slumber or sleep of the dead. When no one is sleeping in death any longer, hades is destroyed.

But “wait,” says the traditionalist, “that’s too good to be true. God can’t just let everybody off the hook. People are SINNERS! Why should I be a Christian now, if all the sinners are going to be let off the hook?”

That’s a good and fair question. And my Bible, which I secretly changed so it would be different from all other Bibles, gives me the answer. Because my Bible says, Jesus “is the satisfaction for our sins. (that is, the sins of believers, the sins of the church.) You see, I can say with the traditionalists, “God is satisfied by Jesus’ blood — He looks at the sins of believers like me and Jerry Falwell, and he doesn’t even see our sins. Though they were scarlet, they become as white as snow. Ain’t it grand? Christians aren’t perfect, they’re forgiven.” Well, I cheated. That feeling felt so good to me that I decided to help out all those poor unbelievers so I added in my Bible, “And not for ours only, but also for the sins OF THE WHOLE WORLD.” (1 John 2:2) Isn’t that great? that way, I can make Jesus into a satisfaction for EVERYONE’s sins, and then they don’t all have to go to hell, after all!

Here’s another verse I made up that makes me feel better: the disciples saw a man that had been blind since he was born, and they asked him who had sinned, the man who was blind, or his parents? (John 9:1ff) Of course, the Arminian would say, it had to be his parents, right, because that poor little fetus couldn’t have sinned in its mother’s womb. But if there were any Calvinists in the audience, they would have said, “Duh! It had to be the FETUS who sinned, — more precisely, who was BORN IN SIN — because it rebelled against God representively, in Father Adam.” Fortunately, I was able to erase Jesus’ answer — I can’t even remember now whether he was a Calvinist or an Arminian. But what I wrote fits my thinking mighty well, because in my Bible Jesus says, “Neither! (Neither explanation is correct) — but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.”
That’s sweet, isn’t it? The man was born blind so that Jesus could come along and heal his blindness, and then people could see that God is not only good, but also powerful. If the man hadn’t been blind all those years, no one would think it was a big deal to cure his blindness — so when God finally got around to it, it proved He was a mighty God indeed! And during all those years when the man was blind, his parents were saddened, the self-righteous religious people thought they were better because they weren’t blind… well, when God finally did something good for that poor sucker it gave everyone a chance to reflect on what Goodness was, after all. Goodness was having mercy on someone in distress, not wearing white robes with blue fringes and thinking they were “holier than thou.” Goodness was being patient, not giving up on God when things weren’t going poorly. Goodness was hoping, and praying, and waiting for the Messiah to come.

Now, if there was only that one example of God’s goodness and power, I would have a weak case for my belief. So I had to change some more verses in MY Bible so that I could convince myself that what happened to that one blind man was really supposed to be a picture for EVERYONE who has ever lived, for ALL victims of all the “acts of God” and “just wars” and “accidents” and such. Now, that was tough, but I managed to find a way to explain away all the results of all the bad things I could think of. Like slavery, in which Christians gave rum and guns to African tribes so they could capture and sell millions of boys and girls to Christians who could bring them through the Middle Passage to the New World, which God had opened up so that the slaves could make sugar and cotton so that the Christians there, who were given the land by God so they could escape from being burned at the stake by other Christians, could sell the sugar and cotton to the smart Christians in England who knew how to turn the sugar into Rum and the cotton into uniforms for the soldiers who would protect the Christians and keep order while honest, hardworking Christians were making more guns and jewelry and other trade goods to give to the Africans who had such hard work to do, constantly filling all those ships with boys and girls. And that was just one thing I had to try and make up a solution for. There was also the Bubonic plague, which killed millions and millions of nice, God-fearing Christians who were embarrased by their ugly disease and killed millions of Jews for causing it. And there were the Indian wars, when good Christians had to exterminate all those red-skinned savages who refused to believe in the Savior, especially after they lost their worthless land to all those Christians who, after all, really needed and were just responding to the grace and generosity of Providence. As the French used to say, “God is on the side of the fat cannons.” And there was the Holocaust, in which millions of Christians had to protect their fatherland from the terrible scourge of brown-eyed savages or flat-nosed Pollocks or hook-nosed Jews. That one was especially tough to explain away, since it perfectly fit the traditionalists picture — Jews, who had rejected Christ long ago, deserved hell anyway, right? So the Nazis simply did what Martin Luther and other great Christians had said God was doing all along — preparing fiery pits where they could be disposed of with maximum suffering. Just like Dante, except Zyklon B is much faster and more efficient than all those primitive fire pits and such. 20th century technology was so much more Godlike than Renaissance imaginations!

Well, I looked and looked and finally, I found a verse I could twist without changing too many words, to make my Bible more comforting to me. So here’s what I came up with: Instead of Isaiah the prophet saying of God, “He formed the earth in pain, He formed it to be desolated” which of course is what the traditionalists keep telling us — that God is sovereign and that there is supposed to be all this pain so that we all know who the Boss is, and that once he’s saved the few, the proud, He will then come and really teach the Sinners a lesson and burn the whole earth up, and then the few, the proud, can watch from Heaven and praise God for his love (of them) and his Justice (in punishing everyone else forever for their rebellion) (believe me, I did not make this up, this is vintage Calvin and Jonathan Edwards) …. well, I changed a few little words in my Bible to make it more pleasing to ME — “Thus says the Lord that created the heavens; God Himself that formed the earth and made it; He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited.” Now, isn’t that slick! Just a few letters, and I feel better! God is interested, not only in heaven, but also in the earth, and his plan is for the earth to be inhabited, lived in. What a concept.

It’s amazing what you can do when you are determined to find a storybook ending to the human race … a “they all lived happily ever after” kind of make-believe…..

PS –

Please forgive my sarcasm in the above post. Some of my best and dearest Christian friends find themselves on both sides of this controversy described above, and others rejoice with me in the hope of the ultimate salvation of all men from the hereditary curse of death. Here’s a very simple description of what I consider to be the essence of true Christianity, and the basis of faith that can and should unite all believers, and make them good examples of humility to unbelievers, who I am not at all worried about. You’ll find this at http://www.fwponline.cc/v20n1reasoner2.htm

It is a conversation between John Wesley, an Arminian, and Charles Simeon, a Calvinist. Simeon speaks to Wesley on December 20, 1784:

“Sir, I understand that you are called an Arminian; and I have been sometimes called a Calvinist; and therefore I suppose we are to draw daggers. But before I consent to begin the combat, with your permission I will ask you a few questions…. Pray, Sir, do you feel yourself a depraved creature, so depraved that you would never have thought of turning to God, if God had not first put it into your heart?

Yes, says the veteran, I do indeed. And do you utterly despair of recommending yourself to God by anything you can do; and look for salvation solely through the blood and righteousness of Christ?

Yes, solely through Christ. But, Sir, supposing you were at first saved by Christ, are you not somehow or other to save yourself afterwards by your own works?

No, I must be saved by Christ from first to last. Allowing, then, that you were first turned by the grace of God, are you not in some way or other to keep yourself by your own power?

No. What, then, are you to be upheld every hour and every moment by God, as much as an infant in its mother’s arms?

Yes, altogether. And is all your hope in the grace and mercy of God to preserve you unto His heavenly kingdom?

Yes, I have no hope but in Him. Then, Sir, with your leave I will put up my dagger again; for this is all my Calvinism; this is my election, my justification by faith, my final perseverance: it is in substance all that I hold and as I hold it; and therefore, if you please, instead of searching out terms and phrases to be a ground of contention between us, we will cordially unite in those things wherein we agree.”

Here’s my main tome on what the Bible says about salvation…. http://www.whyjesusdied.com

Keep diggin!

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • November 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • January 2010
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • November 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • May 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • October 2003
  • November 2002

Categories

  • a happy God
  • barna
  • Bible Questions
  • books
  • Brian McLaren
  • Calvinism
  • christian colonialism
  • Christian liberty
  • Christian trends
  • christianity
  • Christmas
  • Emergent Conversation
  • enjoying the universe
  • eschatology
  • evangelicalism
  • fatherhood
  • forgiveness
  • Generous Orthodoxy
  • George Barna
  • gnosticism
  • Hell
  • Jim Henderson
  • John MacArthur
  • John Piper
  • judgments of God
  • love of God
  • Mark Driscoll
  • media
  • movies
  • off-the-map
  • orthodoxy
  • Personal Observations
  • poverty and its causes
  • Promises of God
  • prophecy
  • race
  • reconciliation
  • religion
  • religion and politics
  • remnant
  • restorationism
  • revolution
  • revolutionconference
  • Rob Bell
  • salvation
  • Theodicy
  • Uncategorized
  • universalism
  • Virginia Tech
  • Zionism

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Happy God
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Happy God
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: